Start the timer, I think we've found the next Jack Thompson soapbox topic (actually I think this has been in his sights for a while, this just adds more fuel to it).
Manhunt 2 has been banned by the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) due to the game being rated AO, or Adults Only, due to what they call "An unrelenting focus on sadism and brutal slaying". As of right now this affects Britain, but other European countries may follow suit such as Germany (who bans anything with violence and Nazis) and Austrailia (which originally was a penal colony, pretty much). But what does that mean for Take Two, Rockstar and gamers? Remember the last "AO" bruhaha?
Hot Coffee. Those two words ignited a fire under the asses of politicians and parents the likes of which have never been seen in the gaming world since the days of Doom and Mortal Kombat. For the two people that think "Hot Coffee" refers to a McDonalds lawsuit, allow me to bring you up to speed...
Hot Coffee was a mini-game in Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas (rated "M" by the way) that after your character went on a date with one of his women they would invite you in for some "Hot Coffee", if the date went well enough (you actually had to build up a relationship with them, the hookers were for random sex after all). This was a feature that was actually cut from the final game so when the topic of "Hot Coffee" came up in the game all you heard were the sounds, no visual of blocky people doing the Hump de Bump (in an "M" rated game, for people 18 and over. Let's not forget that).
However, Rockstar left the actual code in the game for HC, they just put "walls" up to block the content from seeing the light of day. Once hackers and code monkeys started ripping apart the game after release they found the code. In order to play it on the PS2 and Xbox I believe you needed either a modded system or a Gameshark but on the PC it was a whole lot simpler to access the mature content, still in an "M" rated game. The visuals weren't impressive by an means, but god forbid you see simulated sex acts in a game filled with guns, hookers, drugs and other criminal (and dare I say it, adult) acivities.
Parents, politicians, the Amish, family pets; everyone seemed to try to get on the HC bandwagon. Hillary Clinton was one of the most vocal people in this crusade against keeping GTA out of the hands of "young people". Read that again: young people. IT'S A MATURE RATED GAME! I am totally in agreement with kids not being able to play it, but the game isn't marketed towards kids. Games aren't just for kids anymore lady, they've grown up. By the way, wasn't it not too long ago that you could put on pretty much any channel and hear about your husband getting some "Presidential Treatment" in the Oval Office any time of day? At a time when children might be home? While people are eating dinner? Why don't you worry about satisfying the Leader of the Free World's needs and leave the parenting to the parents. K, thanks.
Of course Jack Thompson was all over this like cheese on a cracker but he is always crusading against games and Take Two always seems to be his favorite target. JT actually had a "secret meeting" with the CEO of Take Two not too long ago (I can't link to the article because I'm on my Q. I'll link it later). You can find all of the JT information you ever wanted to know on Wikipedia and gamepolitics.com
The end result of the HC fiasco was the game getting the Adult's Only rating (basically the XXX of the game industry) and the game getting pulled from shelves and re-editied to recieve the more socially acceptable "M" rating it originally had.
What I can never understand is what makes the gaming industry more of a target than the film and industry? Some of the daytime soaps feature some pretty hot and heavy stuff and air at a time when kids may be home. As far as film goes, I've seen more nudity in some PG-13 movies than in some R rated movies. Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't PG-13 mean "13 and over"? Some of the conversations can make me a little uncomfortable sometimes but, as long as your over 13, it's fine. And people wonder why 13 year olds are getting pregnant. And what about movies like Saw and Hostel? I can't even watch Hostel without my stomach turning. Why are these forms of entertainment more socially acceptable than gaming?
Ok enough with the history lesson, what does the mean for Manhunt 2?
First and foremost, the game has just recieved a HUGE amount of free publicity. People that didn't know the game even existed (or coming out for the Wii, a system that needs some edgier games) now know about it.
Secondly, the game now has a huge target on it's back. Out of those people that have just found out about Manhunt 2 (and that it's coming out on the Wii, a system percieved for women, children and the elderly) is sure to send about half of those people off the deep end.
The original Manhunt was basically an interactive snuff film. As a convicted criminal you are chosen the be filmed and see if you survive. It was a fun, but flawed, game that relied more on the grisly violence than the actual story. Manhunt 2 is a story of survival. As a doctor in a mental hospital you have to fight for your life after something goes horribly wrong and figure out what happened.
Why wasn't the first one banned? That one featured more of a criminal element than the new one does and the new one seems to have more story and an actual reason to kill.
But there will be an uproar I'm sure. I don't think the game will be banned here in the states, but I'm sure people like JT, Hillary Clinton and others will start a crusade to "protect our children". There is one thing that they still don't realize...
Videogames are not just for kids!
Most of us are part of the "Nintendo Generation". We grew up with games and, in turn, they grew up with us. While we may still play games like Paper Mario and other "family" type games, sometimes we want something a little more "raw" so to speak. So games, like most forms of entertainment, evolved. So why do we "mature" gamers have to suffer?
As a parent, I actually put a majority of the blame on parents. I play games with my twins, monitor how long and what they play and talk to them if they see something they don't like. For example, I was playing Prince of Persia Classic the other day and Tori didn't like the sound of the blades coming down. She didn't mind the game in general (I told her that the prince was like Aladdin, the princess looks like Jasmin and the vizier's actual name is Jaffar so it works) and she would be happy when I passed them.
Both my girls like racing games, especially Burnout, but hate when I have a big crash because they were in a car accident with my mother and the car actually flipped over and landed on it wheels. So they get a little nervous but I explain that it's just a game.
The bottom line is it's important to play with your kids and monitor what they are playing when your not with them. Let them play different types of games based on the child's maturity, not the rating on the box. Just like kids shouldn't be allowed to play games like GTA there are some immature (and sometimes unstable) older kids that shouldn't be allowed to play them either. Politicians and other law makers should leave monitoring what a child plays to the actual parents. I'm sure there are bigger things for the government to worry about. I think I heard something about a stupid war going on...why don't they worry about bringing our troops home safe instead.